The Economic "Accident"

I honestly cannot find a single woman or child in this photo.

Sometimes conspiracy theories get too much. We've all heard the kind of outrageous stories you expect when people mention the term “conspiracy”, like the Moon being a hollow mind control device for instance. Or some other shit. However when events occur and are even reported in mainstream news that seem so obviously a part of an ongoing agenda, how can we not sit up and take notice?

There are two reactions you usually hear when people mention the term 'White genocide'. One is the predictable shouts of 'racist', the other is the mocking sound of laughter by those who don't fully appreciate the situation. Thing is, if it waddles, quacks and has feathers, it's probably a duck. If it comes up and eats bread out of your hand then we may as well do away with this analogy all together and accept that the concept has some traction.

So what's going on in the world that makes White genocide so obvious? Well there are a few reasons, all fairly self-explained by mass-media themselves. As I've explained before, with this blog I don't attempt to write without at least some degree of factual backing, but it has to be said that usually those who dismiss the idea of white genocide themselves are not paying enough attention. They'll accuse anyone who puts the idea forward as 'ignorant', despite the accusers inability to look at the evidence.

People in Europe today will be all too aware of the ongoing Mediterranean crisis that is happening right now. If you're in the UK you will have no doubt heard of the Calais crisis too, where thousands of migrants are attempting to make their way into Britain on a daily basis. The news has been full of heart-wrenching stories about how terrible it is that people are risking their lives, and that they're only coming here because of wars and persecution in their own countries. Every day we hear the Left saying that we should be doing more to help them, and that every death is a tragedy.

Lets just examine some things here though. If you haven't already read the post I made about Libya, then it may be worth having a read but if you haven't the time, you should realise that Gadaffi himself knew that his regime was what was preventing this kind of chaos in the Mediterranean sea. It is probably reasonable to presume that our wonderful leaders in Europe also knew the risks involved in removing Gaddafi. Unless they expect us to believe that their intelligence services are that diabolically run – which might explain why they're constantly trying to increase their budget. I joke, I joke.

Many of the migrants are also making their from Syria too and making their way into Europe via Turkey, which is obviously another crisis born of Western meddling in foreign affairs – most notably the US/EU/Israeli funding of ISIS via Saudi and Qatar. But that's neither here nor there. The situation has been created, and it's not showing any sign of de-escalating any time soon, so we need to deal with the problem now in one way or the other.

If you aren't colour blind though, you will have made one big realisation with many of these 'refugees' coming across the Mediterranean. Libya and Syria are Arabic, so you would expect most of these refugees to be, well.. Arabic. So why then are a great deal of these people making their way into Europe of African descent? All very strange right?

Consider this then. In Mali, and no doubt in other African countries, the EU has been setting up offices to give advice to Africans on moving to Europe. This is all because the EU has come to the conclusion that in order to basically prevent a total economic collapse due to falling birth rates across the continent, Europe needs 56 million immigrant workers by the year 2050. This news is five years old now, and was reported in mainstream news back in 2010. Fact is, Gadaffi himself even asked the EU for money (again in 2010) to try and keep African migrants from reaching European shores. Gaddafi is probably the world's most misrepresented person in our age, and his honesty and integrity when compared with other world leaders is one of the key reasons for his targeting by what can only be described as international pirates.

As I've already stated in the other post I made about Libya, the UN has effectively told the EU that it needs to“undermine national homogeneity” in Europe. That is essentially a nice way of effectively saying “commit white genocide” and import more people of other ethnicity.

So let us consider the problem then, economically speaking at least, with a falling birthrate. Europeans are today averaging below two children per family, and thus presumably we're worried about a Children of Men style crisis where there is a lack of new blood in the workforce. When there are more old people than young people services and manufacturing decline to a point where it cannot cope with workload. I have to admit, it is a problem, but its a problem which could have been resolved years ago with better management.

I don't know about the rest of Europe, but in the UK there is not really fantastic support for married couples to have children. If they had wanted to solve the issue of a falling birthrate, they could have started giving tax breaks back in 2010, and the whole system would have begun self-rectifying by 2028. I'll let you ponder the obvious math for this situation – it really doesn't take a genius. It also would have been prudent not to over saturate work markets with cheap foreign labour so that wages did not become suppressed – if wages were worth more then parents could have afforded to have had more children. The trouble is economies today are based on short-term fluctuations and very rarely on a long-term basis. We have to conclude this is down to selfish greed of not only companies but also our own gutless leaders.

So instead of taking a slight twenty year slow-down in growth, they've opted instead to artificially keep the economy going by importing cheaper labour from abroad, and supplementing slumping European birthrates with non-European immigration. Clever, but reducing wages with migrant workers is likely to further discourage Europeans from having children because they feel they are unable to provide a good life for their offspring. Bringing in huge numbers of foreigners also causes friction in society. No one is saying that immigration has never happened in the past, but it probably has never occurred on such a huge scale before.

So how is this genocide? Well as above really. Unless our leaders are so helplessly thick that they cannot see these birthrate trends, then they seem quite happy to go ahead with their plans, regardless of how it effects communities, cultures or even (dare I say it) indigenous racial or ethnic survival. The fact that the UN's migration chief Peter Sutherland back in 2012 said that the EU should undermine its 'national homogeneity', it should tell us exactly what is going on here.

Now Peter Sutherland, if you like your conspiracy theories, is an interesting fellow. His family came to Scotland from Ireland, but as we find his name on the patron list of the Irish Jewish museum its likely he self-identifies as being Jewish, and therefore more than likely Zionist. He is a Jesuit educated, EU Commissioner, and previous head of the WTO (World Trade Organisation.) The bloke also served 13 years as a chairman of BP (a business which had massive interest with off-shore Libyan oil,) Goldman Sachs (don't forget Goldman Sachs effectively robbed Gaddafi's savings account) and other banks as well. He also is a part of the Trilataral Commision (which is a 'discussion' group set up by David Rockefeller) a UN spokeman for immigration, and a Bilderberg Group attendee. To top it off he holds sway in the British House of Lords too, and has a long list of Knighthoods from various 'Orders' from across Europe. If you think anyone will have a sway on international policy, it's probably this guy. Thing is, just because he's clearly an important man (or at least self important,) it doesn't mean he doesn't have blatantly obvious self-interest in driving profits for the super-rich. To ignore someone so high up in elite circles would be ridiculous. It is these kinds of people that drive policies, regardless of how much we believe we live in a democracy.

Now when you lay out the policy makers like Sutherland in full view, it's pretty easy to see why they simply do not care about the European peoples rights to their indigenous lands, their culture, or survival as a people. It's about maximising profits, and the quickest way to do that, at least in the foreseeable future is to constantly bring in more workers who will work for less than the natives. Why? Because to the newcomers it is better than what they had in their own countries, and they'll work hard for less money. The European families on the other hand will continue to have less children all the while their offspring are expected to have worse living conditions than their parents had. At the end of the day, nobody likes the thought that their child will live a life that was worse than theirs. It's a total mess, and it is totally unfair and it is absolutely evil.

So when you take into view this recent migrant/refugee "crisis", you have to consider something a bit, well, odd. As discussed already, many of those attempting to reach Europe are not from war-torn countries, they are simply coming to Europe as potential beneficiaries of a Western society. As we already learnt, they're not coming uninvited, the EU invited them back in 2010. This probably explains why in many photos of these crowded boats there are hardly any women or children (boats filled with Africans tend to be mostly men, Syrian refugees seem to be mostly families.) Many have paid thousands to reach Europe, and the traffickers are also making a fortune out of it. In fact it was only the other month that the media grew concerned about the potential number of immigrants funding Islamic extremists. Fact is, as already discussed previously in the Libya post, the fact that Qatar (a key US ally) was heavily involved in ISIS in the early days means that it is highly unlikely the globalist interest groups are interested in stopping this illicit trade. It benefits them in so many ways! And to stop them would be counter productive to that magic 50 million African migrants they want so badly.

This political or economic desire to ensure these migrants reach European shores also totally explains the West's odd decisions. Why are sending our warships out as a immigrant retrieval service? Logic tells me at least, that in order to minimize the amount of deaths of people trying to cross the Mediterranean, its actually better to do nothing. The more people you collect safely, the more will come. Again, the 'economic' argument explains why these people aren't just simply returned back to place of origin (which we would logically theorise, would prevent any further attempts by others.) But again, we now know why this is the current policy. Far from being about helping people, it's about profit margins.

However, there is a dark side to this too. Lets not forget that there really are victims in this, Syrians, Iraqis and Libyans effected by wars that our own Governments have caused, either directly or indirectly. We can't be completely blind to the plight of desperate people who are genuinely trying to get their families out of strife. I totally understand why some of these people are making these incredibly long journeys - and if I was put in their situation I too would probably at least consider doing the same. Even if I wasn't from a war-torn country. The images of the drowned little boy in the papers yesterday was deeply upsetting for everyone I'm sure. I have a daughter not much younger, and I have to say the thought of that situation happening to my little one makes me feel sick.

But. Lets not let emotion cloud our judgement here.

Grasp the fact that whilst I do not want hundreds of thousands of refugees and immigrants pouring into Europe, I do at least want to show some compassion to fellow human beings.

We should be assisting these families from the horrors they are enduring.

But!

This is what the UN is meant to be for!

Now consider another word from our friend Peter Sutherland again, who only the other day once again gave his opinion on the matter of refugees and immigrants. He calls on Europe to, once again, do more to assist these people, saying we need to 'rescue our integrity'. Bollocks we do! This person, and the other scum like him, sit back and do nothing to help the Worlds poorest people. Where is the UN on the Libyan coast? Where is the UN in Syria? Instead of renewing attempts for peace in the Middle East, this utter cretin demands that more immigrants and more refugees pour into Europe to benefit who? The World's richest, once again! To add insult to injury, the companies this turd has worked for pillaged at least one of the countries people are trying to flee from! Utter insanity.

The only saving grace in Syria is that Russia has finally decided to step in on the side of Assad against the Western backed Islamic nut-jobs.

So, the reasons why things aren't getting any better for anyone is clear:
This is a three way fuck up. 

• The EU (on the orders of the UN and other 'advisers') has made the literally insane decision to import African immigrants into Europe because it leads to slightly faster short-term economic growth instead of concentrating on increasing European birth rates. They can have literally no idea how this will pan-out long-term however, but I don't suppose they care.
• Syrian refugees are essentially being used in the same manor as what the African workers are. The UN and other international response refuses to act in conflict hot-spots because war is driving these people into Europe, and thus serving their purposes.
• The European population's demographic rate will likely decrease as they come into competition with these foreigners. The future for white Europeans is bleak, and whether deliberate or accidental, the conditions the EU and globalists have put upon the Europeans falls under sections C & D of Article II of the "Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of Genocide".
  
  At this point, considering the sheer insanity of those we entrust to lead the World with morality, I do not really know what can be done to counter these issues.
  
  As always, comments are always welcome. We would love and appreciate others opinions on this subject.
  
  Thank you for reading through this incredibly long and drawn out post/article.